Tuesday, December 8, 2009
San Francisco Renaissance Assignment
Tuesday, November 10, 2009
Assignment: Quicksand - Helga's time in Naxos
Sunday, October 18, 2009
Saturday, October 10, 2009
Backward Design, meet Walt Whitman. Walt Whitman, meet cultural object. Cultural object, meet Backward Design
A little beefier assignment now...
Intro: A major structural component to Walt Whitman’s “Leaves of Grass” is his use of lists. A major theme in this so-called American epic is about opening his arms to everybody in society, including those on the bottom rungs of the ladder, like the prostitute. The Victorian era had some strict gender notions, for example, “the angel in the house,” yet prostitution was one of the most prevalent jobs next to tailors, showing the polar opposites in extremes: one side being very conservative and oppressed and the other side as a socially unacceptable career but with more freedom and independence. Look at my previous blog post to get more background on Whitman's New Yorker prostitutes.
Some questions: How gender is treated in the poem in terms of masculinity/femininity and gender regarding social order and customs? Think about how Whitman perceived the prostitute. Considering the context of the poem, is he inclusive of the prostitute? What do you think womanhood meant to Whitman, to the generalized Victorian society? How did women end up in prostitution - by choice, force, desperation? The prostitute is mentioned a couple times in the poem here:
Page 22:
The camera and plate are prepared, the lady must sit for her daguerreotype, |
The bride unrumples her white dress, the minutehand of the clock moves slowly, |
The opium eater reclines with rigid head and just-opened lips, |
The prostitute draggles her shawl, her bonnet bobs on her tipsy and pimpled neck, |
The crowd laugh at her blackguard oaths, the men jeer and wink to each other, |
(Miserable! I do not laugh at your oaths nor jeer you,) |
The President holds a cabinet council, he is surrounded by the great secretaries,
|
Page 29:
Assignment: Consider the questions above. Free write for about fifteen minutes (using a computer on either a word doc or blog entry) on what your conceptions of womanhood during the Victorian era are and how Whitman would have been accepting or critical of the prostitute. Do some further online research (because the internet is fast and convenient!) on the gender roles during the 19th century, the links above are only a start- consider how women lived in both the "angel in the house" world and the brothel world. What was the typical upbringing of a woman who ended up in either situation? How might womanhood and the controversial issue of prostitution relevant today? At then end of your free write you will get into groups of three or four and discuss what you wrote. BE SURE TO FREE WRITE AFTER THE RESEARCH SO THAT YOU HAVE A GOOD IMPRESSION ON WHAT TO WRITE ABOUT. *I've suggested using a computer for the free write because I think most people write more using a keyboard than with paper and pen - A little word vomiting is okay because the idea is to have an open-ended discussion afterwards. |
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Reconfiguring “Song of Myself” Using the Walt Whitman Digital Archive
I’ve had a lot of negative emotion surrounding the assignments for this poem. As acknowledged by Professor Hanley and greatly addressed by the class, Diigo, while a great idea in theory is terrible in execution. Just thought I’d join the collective – done and done.
During lab on Tuesday I “explored” the Whitman Archive by mostly peeking over Joseph’s computer because my “workstation” (can you believe that’s what office people call it?) was slow. One of the things that I saw him try was using Token X to do word searches. The results would show the line in one row after another with the highlighted keyword within the line centered so that the lines on either side would be asymmetrical. Here’s a picture to better illustrate what I just said:
LEAVES OF GRASS [1855]... probably the fullest poetical nature . The United States ... ... The largeness of nature or the nation were ... ... the citizen. Not nature nor swarming states nor ... ... and the motion of nature and of the throes ... ... sea, Master of nature and passion and death ... ... flow out of the nature of the work and ... ... of the oneness of nature and the propriety of ... ... my soul reflected in nature . . . . as I see ...
This was a cool way to recreate the poem. It was automatic – no printing out a hardcopy, no manual highlighting, cutting and pasting. Seeing how lines were broken up, what was included and what was left out by ellipses was interesting as well. I’m sure there’s some logical way the computer figures it out using punctuation but hey, I enjoy a lot of science fiction so why not think that a computer (or compy as I like to call it- thanks, Strongbad) can create something that would make me go, “interestiiing.” Talk about FREE VERSE, having a keyword centered wherever it occurs in the line?! On a side note I was surprised by how little some of the keywords that we tried came up in the poem – “Kiss,” for example only had ___ lines.
There’s a lot of well-organized material on this digital archive. Well-organized and digital archive doesn’t go hand in hand very often, either. Stephanie was looking at some poetry where the original scanned manuscript was on the left side of the window and the typed, legible version was on the right, which is a simple idea that would make exploring digitized documents A LOT easier and more interesting. This should be essential for the people working with archives and primary documents online. Yes, Leaves of Grass is a long one, but it would be very cool to read the poem in such a format rather than have a clickable icon above each section to get to the original page – I want to see that pretty handwriting that is much better than mine.
The BIG question we have on our Wiki is, “What is the relationship between the self and the other, the you and the me, etc.?” The first thing (and kind of obvious) idea that popped in my head was to use word searches to take all the lines in the poem where Whitman talks about himself (or uses the I/me pronoun) and do a sort of conversational, call-response weaving of the poem with all the mentions of the you. Somewhere the blending sections of “we,” “us,” and “all” would get pushed somewhere, maybe at the end. Then again, if this idea were put to music, I’d have all those we/us/all’s as a chorus with one consistent melody, the you’s to another melody and the I/me’s to another – hmmm, that was very tangential.
This project got me thinking about the quality of digital archives and how much better it could/should be. I did a lot of competitive analysis one summer for an online advertising company, which sounds fancier than it is – looking at similar websites and reviewing them. We looked at online archives and it seems like the better they are (Whitman archive) the more one could do with the work – reconfigure “Song of Myself.” I can’t imagine doing something like this with a poorly constructed site with non-enlarging images, side by side comparisons of primary and typed versions, and keyword searches.
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
Archives - Something big, old[er] and local
What kind of use and users does it seem to invite? those who already know what they're looking for? those who are just exploring?
How easy is it to search the archive? how flexible are the search tools?
How structured or open is the archive interface? does it guide the user through the collection? does it offer few guided paths for the user?
How are the primary (archival) materials presented? with lots of context? without any context? are the primary materials manipulable? i.e. zoom in and out? with and without fram
Monday, September 21, 2009
Backward Design
Monday, September 7, 2009
Ilearn
It is Tuesday evening, 8:00 pm, and I am writing under some ironic circumstances. The power on my entire block is out so here I am, “blogging” on a Word doc by candlelight.
We pretty much all established that learning took place in the presence of others last Thursday. While the Coopman and Kotkamp articles criticized the power and hierarchy of these CMS tools, I think that in the learning environment, hierarchy is good so long as intention is in good faith. I might have a pretentious teacher that garbles on and on but that garbling is what I am learning. It’s not good learning, by any means, and I think what these articles are trying to do is encourage the dynamic environment that is ideal learning – where both student and teacher learn and grow with strong interaction on all sides. One problem I had with these articles was that they seemed dated but then I saw that they’re quite recent, the Coopman being written just a few months ago. Thus, I agree with Professor Hanley in that these articles undermines the potential of CMS – for example, both articles criticize the fact that students cannot upload files because they do not have access unless the teacher allows it. This is simply a critique of the teacher that exercises such power rather than the CMS programs.
I frequently used Ilearn last semester. It was a good supplement to my classes for forums, posting articles and getting and turning in assignments. I would stress the word supplement. In order for Ilearn to come near an in-class learning experience there would have to be a lot more functions – chat, video capabilities, etc. On a side note, chat would even be limited to having students online at a coordinated time. I certainly did not feel like I was equally engaged as a student in Ilearn with the times I was in class.
I wished the minute we started sharing our learning experiences in class that I didn’t pick diaper changing – let me just get that off my chest. With regards to new media, I think videos are an excellent tool and would be great if incorporated in CMS’s. I learned how to play basic accordion over the summer just by using youtube, and accordion is no easy instrument! If most of our learning involved someone else, then a video would be the closest we could get to a typical education using just new media. Anyone can read and learn but in terms of that dynamic, interaction learning that we’re striving for, there CMS should branch out to video- be it clips or video chats. There will always be limitations to this interactive learning that would be sacrificed in place of in-class learning – facial and vocal expressions, the convenience and immediate response of Q & As and an overall social quality that engages people rather than people being engaged with their computers.